一些群众组织能否专注于群众的思想政治教育？还是这是一种偏差

[luanma]

@CharlesDirba

达尔顿派

指正一下，这里按通行译法应该是“道尔顿”，同姓的还有那位名叫约翰·道尔顿的物理学家

[沼泽士兵]

楼主怎么没出来了

[钱仁零]

查尔斯好像有一个习惯，就是两天不睡觉精神很好，然后第三天就整天睡觉。可能是这个原因。

[CharlesDirba]

嘿，我还在呢！抱歉一直没发帖。我还在。让我看看网上最近的帖子。

[19586]

@CharlesDirba

Basically the issue with the intermediate organizations is that they take up the tasks of the Party and claim they are Communists and want to unite the mass organizations under a basis of unity which is principally ideological and only fit for the Party. Sometimes they justify this by considering their organization as a part of the United Front, but they also act as if it’s an organization which will eventually form a nucleus of the Party. So in this way they mix up two instruments of revolution and also blend between Communists and masses in a way that’s inappropriate.

另外，这是一个没有被转发的概括，翻译成中文大致是：

@CharlesDirba

基本上，中间组织的问题在于，它们承担了党的任务，自称是共产主义者，并试图以一种主要基于意识形态、而实际上只适合党的团结原则为基础，将群众组织团结起来。有时，他们以将自己的组织视为统一战线的一部分为由为这种做法辩解，但同时又表现得仿佛该组织最终将成为党的核心。因此，他们既混淆了革命的两种工具，又以一种不恰当的方式将共产党员与群众混为一谈。